I find it fascinating how we as individuals see things. I am definitely seeing health issues as being part of what makes me who I am, whereas @JayCS your own way of thinking sees your health problems as being totally separate to you as a person. So, never in denial but seen more as slightly ' distanced ' being?? (sorry, I can't quite get my words right on that!) And of course there is no right or wrong! so very personal. Someone far more qualified and experienced will maybe see these different ways of seeing things as some form of coping mechanism? Interesting stuff.
Oh, I'm very much struggling for words/thoughts too!
So let's struggle together, that's more fun.
Yeah, maybe my symptoms/conditions are a consequence of my personality: hyperactiveness will not have caused fibro, but may have contributed to pushing thru too much and crashing fully.
Also my intolerances concur with my "sensitive" emotions, mind etc., but association isn't causation, and I'm actually pretty tough, considering all I've been thru (not because of it).
Most of my conditions aren't surprising, except CVD danger caught me from behind, they all belong to me, are part of me. And I've always had many unusual things, so that fits to my strange personality. So they aren't really separate, they are fully integrated.
But are they an important part of me? Do they make me who I am?
No, they don't influence what I'd do if I could and when I can. I'm completely "me" without a single one. They don't influence my emotions, my mentality, my attitude, my faith.
Not even the depressiveness in my youth, not even the social phobia after that, which I've both learnt to overcome for the main part. Bit shy, but also quite a few extraverted parts, may depend on my condition what I can use, but don't define me.
That may be the secret (reason): I found treatments, workarounds or at least adapted to all my life-long issues, so when I was 50 I was fitter than I'd ever been before, was doing 1-2h/d of sports. And even for all my conditions now I've found very successful ways to influence them. The biggest discrepancy is loving activity, but my severe exhaustibility being very hard to improve. But working on it, and in no way is it me, just I fully accept that it is there to stay with me, like many things, and that I need to adapt my activity to online, task-switching etc. to remain just as active as ever all day. And if that's not possible I switch to as active rest as possible and active mindfulness.
I think it's this attitude that has made me keep up a high quality of life, or rather has led me to find it properly for the first time, instead of just doing things, but desiring something deeper. That desire ... for that attitude is what belongs to me, seems to define me.
But it's also fully savouring the
good times where cortisol can override symptoms for a while, where we feel normal. That keeps showing me if I can find better biochemical balance, the more I'd be fine. Not "me" either with or without tho.
I dunno: like my wife is one of the most important things in my life, "belongs" to me, much more than an accessory, influences me, but doesn't define me??
But in the imploring words my grandchild astounded me with the other day (maybe from a film? but who cares): "Granddad, I
don't see you like that, I don't see you as old or fragile".
(The context was a bit intricate, but doesn't matter that much: I'd pretended hitting me in fun had hurt me. And may have been implying: don't muck around with that).
When we meet, first question has become: How are you? Meaning very specifically: How can we play? Can you lift me? Can you pretend to run around? Or shall we play make-believe things instead?
So does it like I do, take it as it comes, makes the best of it.
No denial?: And also no, never in denial, even when I pushed thru things, I always knew that I am a mentally and physically challenged person that needs to find his own way, as hardly anyone can help.
Slightly distanced?: I think so. In that respect I've been influenced by Buddhism and Christianity, radical acceptance and Serenity Prayer. When I did an online course of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy last year to make sure I wasn't missing something, I didn't learn anything I wasn't practicing already, but it helped me practice even more to be aware that my thoughts and emotions are not reality, they are just that, my subjective thoughts and emotions. And that's a form of distancing. I don't like full Buddhist distancing from everything tho, it's also dangerous for the old grey emptiness in me, I need vividness, even if means suffering.
Coping mechanism?: Well, "mechanism" seems to imply (like denial etc.) I'm not doing it consciously, rather inadvertently, unknowingly. But my practice of radical acceptance / serenity prayer incl. all the mindfulness and other attitudes that are necessary for it are very conscious coping techniques that I've taken up for decades, but have now come to the fore, and I can very much see how effective they are for me.
And being "slightly distanced" and not seeing my issues as a necessary important part of me has been useful for motivation and improvement of my symptoms, which is the opposite of what coping mechanisms do.
Is it me?: A pain psychologist once offered me the image of my condition be like an uncle on my back I need to carry around with me. Pretty unfortunate image, awful thought to me. But I spose a kind of distancing. Insted I see my symptoms as showing me the momentary limits of my body asking me to self-care better. Limits vary, esp. with age. My conditions have also often varied in a wack-a-mole way, but I always won by increasing my self-knowledge and self-care. By playing it patiently, like I play rummy.