Little Debbie, I am sorry you are offended by what I have said. I mean no disrespect, nor am I trying to be mean, negative, or pessimistic, as none of those things are in my nature. But I do believe that a healthy skepticism is a good thing to have in the world, and it is not at all a negative quality.
I am simply pointing out that it is appropriate and traditional for a person who is making scientific or statistical medical claims to offer proof of those claims by noting his sources, which should scientific peer-reviewed studies rather than anecdotal. This is standard practice.
And it is up to the person making the claims to validate their information, and not up to the person reading it to prove them wrong. Asking for sources is not rude, but is again standard practice if they are not being supplied.
The fact that he has ignored completely all posts asking for his sources of information is suspect to me. He could have responded, even if it were only to say that he didn't want to supply those here but they are fully annotated in his book. I am just offering an opinion, as you are. Thanks for the feedback, and the chance to explain my reasons. I stand by my statements, but am not trying to say that anyone else should see things the same way I do.